Effects of application of food grade mineral oil to peas, lentils and food-type soybeans on quality attributes
Summary
This study was conducted to examine the impact of mineral oil application on quality of peas, lentils and food-type soybeans. Results indicated that mineral oil applied at levels from 0.02 to 0.06% by weight (w/w) had no significant impact on specific quality attributes.
Goals and objectives
The purpose of application of food grade mineral oil is to control dust emissions during grain handling at terminal elevators. The maximum amount allowed for application of mineral oil is 0.02% w/w. The objective of this study was to investigate if the application of food-grade mineral oil at levels of 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06% (w/w) to peas, lentils and food-type soybeans would affect specific quality parameters.
Materials and methods
Pea and lentil samples for this study were obtained from Canadian pulse processors. The project looked at
- two green pea samples
- three yellow pea samples
- three green lentil samples (one large size, one medium size, one small size)
- two red lentil samples
- four red lentil samples (for the dehulling study)
- four food-type soybean samples (three generic and one natto type) from the 2018 Harvest Sample Program
Each 4 kg sample was mixed and then split into eight subsamples using a Boerner divider (Seedburo Equipment Company, Chicago, IL). Each subsample was then treated with food-grade mineral oil (C330779-1L) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) at levels of 0.0 (control), 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06% w/w, respectively, in duplicate. An airbrush (TCP Global, San Diego, CA) connected to an air compressor was used to apply mineral oil to the samples. 40 treated pea, 48 treated lentil, 32 treated red lentil (dehulling study) and 32 treated food-type soybean samples were analyzed.
The following tests were performed on the samples according to published or standard methods.
Peas and lentils
- Physical characteristics (100-seed weight and water absorption) (1)
- Chemical composition (protein, moisture, starch and ash content) (1,2)
- Functional properties (water-holding and oil emulsifying capacity) (1,5)
- Cooking quality of peas (cooking time and firmness of cooked seeds) (1,4)
- Dehulling quality of red lentils (dehulling efficiency and color) (3)
Food-type soybeans
- Physical characteristics (100-seed weight and water absorption) (1)
- Chemical composition (protein and oil content) using near-infrared (NIR) spectrometer
- Sugars and oligosaccharides (sucrose, raffinose, stachyose and verbascose content) (6)
Data were assessed by analysis of variance using the Statistical Analysis System (V.9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The Duncan’s multiple range test was used to separate means and significance was accepted at p<0.05.
Results
Effect on pea quality attributes
Figure 1 shows the results of applying mineral oil to peas at levels from 0.0 to 0.06% (w/w) on certain quality attributes. Results showed that application of mineral oil had no significant effect on seed weight, water absorption capacity, cooking time and firmness of cooked peas. No significant difference in protein, starch and ash content was observed amongst treated pea samples. Application of mineral oil had no significant effect on water holding capacity or oil emulsifying capacity of pea flours.
Figure 1A Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on 100-seed weight (g/100 seeds)
-
Details
Figure 1A Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on 100-seed weight (g/100 seeds) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 1 22.6 22.3 21.1 21.3 19.6 2 23.2 22.5 20.3 21.2 19.6 3 23.0 22.2 20.1 21.5 19.5 4 22.8 23.2 20.3 21.1 19.8 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 1B Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on water absorption capacity (g H2O/g seeds)
-
Details
Figure 1B Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on water absorption capacity (g H2O/g seeds) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 1 0.89 0.91 0.87 0.90 0.91 2 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.90 0.84 3 0.89 0.92 0.86 0.89 0.88 4 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.89 0.88 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 1C Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on cooking time (min)
-
Details
Figure 1C Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on cooking time (min) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 1 18.9 14.5 18.1 22.4 12.2 2 18.2 13.9 15.7 20.3 12.8 3 20.8 14.7 16.8 18.4 12.3 4 19.3 13.8 18.0 20.7 11.3 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 1D Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on protein content (% dry basis)
-
Details
Figure 1D Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on protein content (% dry basis) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 1 23.8 23.4 24.6 24.1 25.3 2 23.8 23.5 24.8 23.8 25.3 3 24.0 23.4 24.4 24.1 25.5 4 24.0 24.1 25.1 24.4 25.9 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 1E Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on starch content (% dry basis)
-
Details
Figure 1E Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on starch content (% dry basis) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 1 45.8 46.8 46.8 48.1 46.8 2 46.6 46.4 47.1 48.2 47.0 3 45.7 46.5 47.5 47.6 46.8 4 47.0 46.8 47.4 48.0 47.2 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 1F Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on water holding capacity of pea flour (g H2O/g sample)
-
Details
Figure 1F Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on water holding capacity of pea flour (g H2O/g sample) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 1 0.97 0.97 1.02 1.00 1.03 2 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 3 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.01 4 0.96 0.95 1.01 1.00 1.01 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 1 Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to pea samples on (A) 100-seed weight, (B) water absorption capacity, (C) cooking time, (D) protein, (E) starch and (F) water holding capacity of pea flour. X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Effect on lentil quality attributes
Figure 2 shows the results of applying mineral oil to lentils at levels from 0.0 to 0.06% (w/w). Application of mineral oil had no significant effect on seed weight, water absorption capacity, protein, starch and ash content of lentils. There was no significant effect of mineral oil on dehulling efficiency, the amount of powder produced, and the amount of broken seeds produced during dehulling of red lentils. No significant difference in the color (redness) of dehulled whole seeds and dehulled split seeds was observed.
Figure 2A Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to lentil samples on 100-seed weight (g/100 seeds)
-
Details
Figure 2A Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to lentil samples on 100-seed weight (g/100 seeds) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 Sample #6 1 6.6 6.7 4.9 3.1 3.0 3.0 2 6.7 6.7 4.8 3.1 3.1 3.1 3 6.6 6.6 4.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 4 6.6 6.7 4.9 3.1 3.0 3.1 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 2B Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to lentil samples on protein content (% dry basis)
-
Details
Figure 2B Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to lentil samples on protein content (% dry basis) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 Sample #6 1 26.0 25.8 25.5 26.4 26.4 27.3 2 25.9 25.9 25.5 26.5 26.3 27.3 3 26.0 26.1 25.5 26.5 26.4 27.2 4 26.1 26.0 25.6 26.5 26.5 27.4 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 2C Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to lentil samples on starch content (% dry basis)
-
Details
Figure 2C Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to lentil samples on starch content (% dry basis) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 Sample #5 Sample #6 1 47.3 47.7 47.8 47.0 46.7 46.6 2 47.3 47.1 47.9 46.8 46.6 46.5 3 47.9 47.7 48.1 46.9 46.7 46.6 4 47.3 47.2 48.3 46.8 47.2 46.7 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 2D Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to red lentil samples on dehulling efficiency (%)
-
Details
Figure 2D Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to red lentil samples on dehulling efficiency (%) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 83.6 83.8 83.4 83.3 2 83.8 83.5 83.8 83.6 3 84.1 84.0 83.6 83.5 4 83.6 83.2 83.2 83.1 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 2E Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to red lentil samples on redness (a* value) of dehulled whole seeds
-
Details
Figure 2E Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to red lentil samples on redness (a* value) of dehulled whole seeds X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 28.6 28.8 29.1 29.0 2 29.2 28.9 28.9 28.8 3 29.1 28.7 28.9 28.9 4 28.5 28.7 28.6 28.8 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 2F Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to red lentil samples on redness (a* value) of dehulled split seeds
-
Details
Figure 2F Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to red lentil samples on redness (a* value) of dehulled split seeds X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 29.5 29.6 29.4 29.5 2 29.6 29.5 29.9 29.7 3 29.6 29.5 29.9 29.7 4 29.1 29.2 29.4 29.2 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 1 Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to lentil samples on (A) 100-seed weight, (B) protein, (C) starch content, (D) dehulling efficiency, (E) redness (a* value) of dehulled whole seeds and (F) redness of dehulled split seeds of red lentils X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Effect on food-type soybeans quality attributes
Figure 3 shows the results of applying mineral oil to food-type soybeans. Results indicated that application of mineral oil at levels from 0.02 to 0.06% (w/w) had no significant effect on seed weight, water absorption capacity, protein, oil and sucrose content in food-type soybeans when compared to untreated soybeans.
Figure 3A Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on 100-seed weight (g/100 seeds)
-
Details
Figure 3A Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on 100-seed weight (g/100 seeds) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 20.1 20.2 22.6 9.9 2 20.0 20.3 23.6 10.1 3 20.3 20.5 22.8 10.1 4 20.1 20.4 23.3 10.0 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 3B Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on water absorption capacity (g H2O/g seeds)
-
Details
Figure 3B Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on water absorption capacity (g H2O/g seeds) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 1.21 1.15 1.14 1.22 2 1.21 1.17 1.15 1.22 3 1.26 1.16 1.15 1.23 4 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.22 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 3C Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on protein content (% dry basis)
-
Details
Figure 3C Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on protein content (% dry basis) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 40.5 41.5 43.0 41.3 2 40.3 41.7 43.1 41.2 3 40.4 41.7 43.1 41.1 4 40.2 41.6 43.0 41.2 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 3D Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on oil content (% dry basis)
-
Details
Figure 3D Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on oil content (% dry basis) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 22.8 22.1 21.0 20.2 2 23.0 22.1 21.1 20.2 3 22.9 22.1 20.9 20.1 4 23.0 22.1 21.0 20.2 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 3E Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on sucrose content (g/kg dry basis)
-
Details
Figure 3E Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on sucrose content (g/kg dry basis) X-axis Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Sample #4 1 54.6 57.3 61.4 53.1 2 54.1 57.3 61.2 53.4 3 54.6 58.0 61.8 53.0 4 54.0 57.2 60.5 52.6 X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Figure 3 Effect of application of food grade mineral oil to food-type soybean samples on (A) 100-seed weight, (B) water absorption capacity, (C) protein, (D) oil and (E) sucrose content. X-axis: 1–0.0% mineral oil applied; 2–0.02% (w/w) applied; 3–0.04% (w/w) applied; and 4–0.06% (w/w) applied.
Conclusion
The application of food grade mineral oil to peas, lentils and food-type soybeans at levels from 0.02 to 0.06% w/w has no significant impact on their specific quality attributes when compared to untreated soybeans.
References
- AACCI. (2011) (11th ed.). Approved Methods of the AACC International, Methods 44-17.01, 56-35.01, 56-36.01, 56-37.01, 76-13.01, and 08-16.01. The Association: St. Paul, MN.
- AOAC. (2000) (17th ed.) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
- Wang, N. (2005). Optimization of a laboratory dehulling process for lentils (Lens culinaris). Cereal Chemistry, 82(6), 671-676.
- Wang, N., & Daun, J. K. (2005). Determination of cooking times of pulses using an automated Mattson cooker apparatus. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85, 1631-1635.
- Wang, N., & Maximiuk, L. (2015). Development of an improved electrical resistance method for determining emulsifying capacity of pulse and soy materials. Cereal Chemistry, 92, 253-257.
- Wang, N., Hatcher, D. W., Tyler, R. T., Toews, R., & Gawalko, E. J. (2010). Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Research International, 43, 589-594.
Related links
"Page details"
- Date modified: